View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy Lean Canvas | ![]() Decision Making Force Field Analysis | ![]() Business Strategy Business Model Stress Test | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | A Business Model Stress Test checks how well a business model holds up under pressure and headwinds. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a stress-test report and action plan per scenario. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | Half day | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-6 | 3-12 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment Backlog | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Stress Test Report, Action Plan per Scenario | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model | ChangeDecisionStrategy | StrategyBusiness modelRiskDiagnosis | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |



