methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a Lean Canvas with nine fields, notes, and one highlighted learning risk.
Product Strategy
Lean Canvas
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
When an early product bet still has too many open points, it brings target group, problem, and assumptions into a single view. It condenses the idea so core risks become nameable.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min1-2 Tage15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
1-62-510-302-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Lean Canvas, Core Assumptions, Experiment BacklogA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
StartupLeanAssumptionsBusiness model
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods