methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Knowledge Mapping.
Knowledge Modeling
Knowledge Mapping
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent
Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h2-6 h1-4 h2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-123-83-82-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer PlanFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
KnowledgeMappingRisk
RiskRoot causeSafety
RiskDecisionSensemaking
Root causeSafetyIncident
Add more methods