View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Kepner-TregoeHypothesis-Driven TroubleshootingRoot Cause AnalysisFailure Mode and Effects Analysis
| Criterion |  Operations Kepner-Tregoe |  Engineering Hypothesis-Driven Troubleshooting |  Operations Root Cause Analysis |  Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations. | When systems fail unexpectedly, spontaneous attempts often produce more noise than insight. Hypothesis-driven Troubleshooting translates symptoms into testable assumptions and makes troubleshooting learnable. | When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 2-8 h | 30-240 min | 1-4 h | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-6 | 3-8 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Problem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan | Hypothesis Log, Test Plan, Evidence Notes, Diagnosis Summary | Problem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations | TroubleshootingProblem solvingDiagnosis | Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |