View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Business Strategy Scenario Planning |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 0.5-2 Tage | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 4-12 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |