View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Facilitation Decision Jam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 60-120 min | 30-60 min | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 5-12 | 2-8 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop |