View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Operations Learning Review |  UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-10 | 3-10 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Learning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |