View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 2-3 h | 5-15 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-8 | 3-20 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |