methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 Wochen30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
10-505-12 Interviews5-10 Interviews5-12 Interviews
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesJob Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments
Tagsno overlap
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Add more methods