View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 2-4 h | 30–60 min per interview | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 4-10 | 1 participant per interview | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | JourneyServiceService design | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |