View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |