View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-8 | 1-8 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | ICE Table, Top Idea List |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision |