methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Flywheel.
Growth
Flywheel
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage120 min initial, dann laufend60-120 min90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
10-503-63-83-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority ThemesHEART-GSM Table, DashboardFlywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment BacklogGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
GrowthRetentionConversion
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods