View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Agile Example Mapping |  UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |  Product Discovery Context Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-7 | 3-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas |