View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Innovation Lotus Blossom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 5-15 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 10-50 | 3-20 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop |