View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  UX Research Empathy Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 60-90 min | 30–60 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 4-10 | 4-8 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |