View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  Product Strategy ICE Scoring |  Decision Making Risk Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When ideas need sorting quickly, it condenses impact, confidence, and effort into one compact score. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as an ICE table and top-ideas list. | When a project faces many possible disruptions, it quickly becomes unclear which risks deserve attention first. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Risk Matrix and a Top Risk List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 3-10 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | ICE Table, Top Idea List | Risk Matrix, Top Risk List |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | PrioritizationScoringGrowthDecision | RiskDecisionPrioritizationAssessment |