View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-90 min | 30-60 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |