View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Agile Specification by Example |  Operations After-Action Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 30-60 min | 60-90 min pro Feature | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | 1-5 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | LearningOperationsImprovement |