View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  DevOps Incident Command |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45–75 min | As needed | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 10-50 | Team members involved | 4-15 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Incident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder Updates | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | IncidentOperationsReliability | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |