View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Kanban |  Agile NoEstimates |  Product Discovery Dual-Track Agile |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules. | When uncertainty and delivery run in parallel, it separates learning work from implementation while keeping both connected. It prevents unvalidated ideas from falling directly into the delivery stream. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | laufend | Laufend, Wochen bis Monate | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 2-12 | 4-10 | 3-9 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing Rules | Discovery Backlog, Delivery Backlog, Experiment-Ergebnisse, Validierte Stories | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | FlowVisual managementDelivery | EstimationForecastingFlow | AgileDiscoveryDelivery | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |