View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Engineering Kanban |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Ongoing | 45-60 min | 1-3 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 2-8 | 4-10 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | FlowVisual managementDelivery | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | LeanFlowWasteDelivery | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |