View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Kaizen Event |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 0.5-5 Tage | 2-4 h | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-12 | 2-5 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements |
Tagsno overlap | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam |