methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen30-60 min je Interview45-75 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews5-12 Interviews2-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsTest Matrix, Test PlanClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods