View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Product Discovery Pretotyping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 60-120 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-4 | 3-6 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | ValidationDemandMVP | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |