View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 60-120 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 5-12 | 15-200 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |