methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration of Scatter Diagram with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Scatter Diagram
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen2-6 h30-90 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews3-101-43-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsScatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, HypothesenlisteFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Root causeQualityVisualization
RiskRoot causeSafety
Add more methods