methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
A paper-based illustration representing Event Modeling with its core stages and visible working result.
Knowledge Modeling
Event Modeling
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.Event Modeling connects business workflows with commands, events, and views into one coherent mental model. It helps design behavior, UI, and technical slices from the same underlying logic.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen2-6 h1-3 h1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews2-82-82-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListEvent Model, UI Flow, Commands, Read ModelsGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesContext Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
EventsBlueprintDomain-Driven DesignBehavior
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
Add more methods