methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen5-15 min30-60 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews3-201-55-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods