methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
A paper-based illustration representing OKRs with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Strategy
OKRs
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When strategic direction needs to become measurable, it connects ambition with checkable results. It makes goals connectable to focus and review.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen60-90 min1-2 h Setup1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews4-102-205-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentOKR set, Measurement plan, Review cadenceConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
GoalsAlignmentOutcomesMeasurement
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods