methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen60-90 min30-120 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews4-102-65-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
LeanObservationProcessOperations
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods