methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a JTBD interview notebook with a decision timeline, forces of change and a concise job hypothesis.
Product Discovery
Jobs to Be Done
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing Kano Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Kano Model
Purposedifferent
When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 Wochen1-3 Wochen30-60 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-12 Interviews4-12 Beobachtungen1-510-50
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity ListField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control ListKano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes
Tagsno overlap
CustomerOutcomesNeeds
UX researchObservationContext
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer
Add more methods