View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis | ![]() Operations Scatter Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. | When the question is whether two measures are related, the method makes patterns in the data picture visible. It separates felt correlations from relationships that actually show up in the data. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 1-4 h | 2-6 h | 30-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 1-5 | 3-10 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions | Scatter Plot, Korrelationsnotiz, Hypothesenliste |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause | Root causeQualityVisualization |



