View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Jobs to Be Done |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When switching motives and progress are unclear, it reconstructs the situation from real customer circumstances. It shows why a switch happens and what kind of progress is being sought. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 1-2 h | 5-15 min | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-12 Interviews | 4-12 | 3-20 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Job Stories, Outcome Statements, Opportunity List | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes |
Tagsno overlap | CustomerOutcomesNeeds | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds |