View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Customer Journey Mapping | ![]() Innovation Starbursting | ![]() Product Discovery Concierge MVP | ![]() Innovation Lotus Blossom |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-10 | 3-10 Kunden | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Lotus Diagram, Idea Themes, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyServiceService design | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop |



