methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a journey map with four connected phases, several experience lanes and a point marked for closer investigation.
UX Research
Customer Journey Mapping
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately.When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
2-4 h0.5-2 Tage30 min Setup, dann laufend2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
4-106-121-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity BacklogService Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership MapRAID Log, Status Report SourceFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions
Tagsno overlap
JourneyServiceService design
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Add more methods