methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a journey map with four connected phases, several experience lanes and a point marked for closer investigation.
UX Research
Customer Journey Mapping
Paper illustration of RAID Log with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Delivery
RAID Log
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing Service Blueprint with its core stages and visible working result.
UX Design
Service Blueprinting
Purposedifferent
When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately.Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
2-4 h30 min Setup, dann laufend2-6 h0.5-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
4-101-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone3-106-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity BacklogRAID Log, Status Report SourceFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsService Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map
Tagsno overlap
JourneyServiceService design
RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint
Add more methods