View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Growth Flywheel |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | Growth often breaks down where a reinforcing mechanism builds up too much friction. A Flywheel shows the cycle of value, repetition, and reinforcement meant to sustain growth. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 60-120 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-8 | 3-10 Kunden | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Flywheel Map, Friction Points, Growth Levers, Experiment Backlog | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyServiceService design | GrowthRetentionConversion | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |