methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a journey map with four connected phases, several experience lanes and a point marked for closer investigation.
UX Research
Customer Journey Mapping
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Purposedifferent
When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately.When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
2-4 h30-90 min45-90 min30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-102-83-121-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity BacklogConstraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List
Tagsno overlap
JourneyServiceService design
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
ChangeDecisionStrategy
DecisionTreeOptions
Add more methods