View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Team Design Team API |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-90 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Team API Document | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyServiceService design | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |