View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  UX Design Service Blueprinting |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When a service experience is spread across several touchpoints, it brings frontstage and backstage together. It shows where user contact and internal responsibility must fit. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 45-90 min | 0.5-2 Tage | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 2-5 | 6-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Service Blueprint, Fail Points, Ownership Map | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | JourneyServiceService design | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | Service designOperationsJourneyBlueprint | LeanObservationProcessOperations |