methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-2 h60-120 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-102-83-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanTOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority ActionsConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
StrategyAnalysisOptions
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods