methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-3 h1-4 h2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
4-123-123-82-6
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanSystem Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action PlanBarrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Root causeSafetyIncident
Add more methods