methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Systems Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Systems Mapping
Paper illustration for Behavior Over Time Graph.
Systems Thinking
Behavior Over Time Graph
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins.A Behavior Over Time Graph shows how a metric or observation develops over time. The method makes trends, breaks, and recurring patterns visible that get lost in snapshots.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowHigh
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage1-3 h20-45 min2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
4-123-121-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanSystem Map, Dependencies, Leverage PointsBehavior Over Time Graph, Trend Hypotheses, Key EventsFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections
Tags1 shared
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange
Systems thinkingPatternsDynamics
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Add more methods