View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Agile Starfish Retrospective |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued. | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 45-90 min | 2-4 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 4-12 | 3-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Starfish Board, Practice Changes, Experiments | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |