View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Operations Standard Work Analysis |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 1-3 h | Half day | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-6 | 3-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Standard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training Needs | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | LeanProcessQuality | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | LeanObservationProcessOperations |