View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Solution Interview | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing | ![]() Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 45-90 min | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 5-10 Interviews | 2-8 | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |



