methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration of the Lotus Blossom working structure.
Innovation
Lotus Blossom
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Reverse Brainstorming
Innovation
Reverse Brainstorming
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.When a central question feels too large, the method breaks it into neighboring topic fields with their own depth of ideation. It holds structure and openness at the same time, so adjacent perspectives don't get lost. This grows an idea space out of a core problem.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowHighLow
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage45-90 min2-4 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
4-123-103-83-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanLotus Diagram, Idea Themes, ShortlistFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsReverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityDivergenceWorkshop
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk
Add more methods