View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Systems Thinking Leverage Points |  Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | High | High |
Timedifferent | 1-5 Tage | 120 min initial, dann laufend | Half day | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 3-6 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Leverage Map, Action Strategy | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy | StrategyMetricsExecution |