methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-5 Tage90-180 min2-4 h120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
4-123-63-83-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanGQM Table, Metric ProfilesFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved InjectionsHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods